One of my favorite tropes in literature is “a truce” between
the heroes and the villains.
Two sides of a conflict realize they must work together
against a common enemy or to achieve a common goal -- hero and villain, side by
side, each of them using their dominant traits for a good purpose. Well, good in that it advances the plot and
provides tension for the reader.
I’m using a writer’s definition of good here.
The tension, of course, comes from our distrust of the
villain. Take the Governor’s meeting with Rick in The Walking Dead. I couldn’t
have been the only viewer who expected this “truce” was really a trap and that
not all the good guys were going to make it out alive.
And we never trusted Gollum, did we? His only reason for
serving Frodo was to get that ring back.
But sometimes, we hope for a conversion. Arya had to
tolerate the Hound because, in this case, her enemy was her only refuge for
safety. It served the Hound’s purpose to keep her safe – she was no good for
ransom if she was dead. But there were moments when I wondered whether Arya
would be a good influence on him – whether she would awaken whatever kindness
remained inside him. There was also the danger that too much of the Hound's darkness would rub off on Arya.
In Gregor the
Overlander, the Prophecy of Gray requires the quest participants tolerate a rat among them. Literally, a rat. A giant rat and member of an enemy species. Ripred is smart, fast, and deadly. They need him as
a guide, but how far can they trust him, especially if he’s betraying his own
kind?
Several of the books
in the Artemis Fowl series involve
Artemis and the fairy people joining forces. The LEP (Lower Element Police) need Artemis’s criminal genius, and Artemis needs their magic.
Through their extended acquaintance, mutual respect develops, providing moral
development in our young anti-hero.
In Fablehaven, a
devastating betrayal midway through the series is made even more complicated
when the unmasked and incarcerated villain becomes the heroes’ only hope of
defeating a greater evil. Dare they release someone who has betrayed them once
already – and worse, rely on this person to save them?
I have more than one truce arrangement in the Eighth Day series – first with a trio of minor villains in book one, and then with more dangerous ones later in the
series. I hadn't even realized the persistence of this running theme in my books until I started to write this post. Guess I really love this idea, huh?
Can you think of a truce between heroes and villains that
provides tension in one of your favorite books? Have you ever used one in your
own writing?
Assuming that my cover art is approved today, I’ll be back on Thursday
– our usual day off – to reveal the cover of The Inquisitor’s Mark here at Project Mayhem. Along
with the artwork, we’ll get to hear from the designer himself about his
creative process, the thinking behind his design, and see some the preliminary
sketches that led to the final thing. I can't wait!
How dare you refer to Sandor Clegane as a villain?! Just kidding.
ReplyDeleteThe first thing that comes to mind is Kirk and Khan in Star Trek's reboot Into Darkness. It's not a book, but it is a great truce.
You have to admit, the Hound views himself as a villain.
DeleteAs for Kirk and Khan, there's another example of a truce I didn't trust at all. I expected Khan to turn on him at first opportunity!
That's a fair point about Khan, especially since it was a reboot.
DeleteLooking forward to seeing the cover!
ReplyDeleteI just finished watching a Once Upon a Time marathon. Not a book, but they did a great job with the hero/truce villain idea.
I haven't followed that series, but I'll bet it provides some unique opportunities for cross-fairytale truces!
DeleteThe optimist in me likes when opposing forces work together, if only to give more dimension to the villains, even when they break that truce as quick as possible, for a brief moment you see the positive attributes of villains of what otherwise is seen as horrid because how they use them is different.
ReplyDeleteThat ruthless affinity for fighting can be a positive when used to protect what under normal circumstance would destroy what's important to the hero's worldview, versus their possible raw pleasure of it, and the heroes learn to see their own darkness in a reverse contrast.
But the best truces feel natural in that it's not randomly put on the reader's shoulders.
That said, my debut does deal with allies to the antagonist aiding the protagonist, and I worked really hard to have it read organically, and gave enough setup to come off natural.
Agreed, Taurean! I think the appeal for me is that glimpse into the personality of the villain when he is NOT opposing the hero, but helping him. There's often an intimate glimpse of the villain's merits and strengths - and yes, sometimes the hero gets to explore his inner dark side!
DeleteLet's hear it for the Villains! Often times, they are the most compelling characters in a story.
ReplyDeleteYou bet! If it wasn't for the villains, the heroes would have nothing to do. Right? They'd be just guys, hanging around.
DeleteI absolutely love this post, Dianne. It has made me look back at all the truces I've read and written and how they play such an important role in creating more depth to both characters.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Eden. Yes, having a time when hero and villain work together deepens both of them.
Delete